← Search

Wade Conklin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Jose, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 136W–88L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history224 matches
L
2026-10-25 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK CM7.5C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chad Tenturier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-25 · BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hao Chen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-11 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK CM7.5C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Reiji Hirayama
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-11 · BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anastas Budagov
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-08 · BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CM8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Liu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-03 · BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CM8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Zhou
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-09-14 · BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roger Lin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-13 · BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CM8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Kwon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK CM7.5C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ahmer Khan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CM8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Liu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 18AM4.0B · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Bloom
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-4
W
2026-06-13 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 18AM4.0B · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Joseph
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 57.7% of games
4.0
53.9%
41W–35L · 52.7% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.8% of games
7.5
57.1%
20W–15L · 51.2% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.2%
26W–10L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
69.7%
23W–10L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
55 matches
#1 Singles
8%
17 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer