← Search

Heather Brinkman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SAINT LOUIS, MO
4.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
68 matches · 42W–26L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history68 matches
L
2026-08-14 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey K Trembath championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Basham/Trembath · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Flynn
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-02 · Basham/Trembath · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey K Trembath
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Basham/Trembath · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abbie Bradley
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Runge
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-08 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Runge
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-5
L
2026-02-08 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abbie Bradley
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-5
L
2025-07-29 · Mohrman/Hi-Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Woodman
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-07-01 · Mohrman/Hi-Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Woodman
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-21 · Mohrman/Hi-Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Mckeown
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-04 · Gadsky · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Ray Ohara mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-18 · Gadsky · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Daniel Schneller mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5
72.5%
29W–11L · 59.9% of games
10.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.3% of games
9.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert