← Search

Connie Faint

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Eden Prairie, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 10W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history33 matches
W
2026-07-09 · Faint: Eden Prairie Shippers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elisa Wright
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Faint: Eden Prairie Shippers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marjorie Champlin
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · Faint: Eden Prairie Shippers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elisa Wright
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-06-26 · Faint-Shippers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Burns
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-06-05 · Faint-Shippers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elisa Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-05-29 · Faint-Shippers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elisa Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-08-16 · Northern/Kerr/65&O6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elisa Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5
W
2023-08-16 · Northern/Kerr/65&O6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elisa Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0
L
2023-07-18 · Faint- Shippers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elisa Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-27 · Faint- Shippers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Owen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2023-06-20 · Faint- Shippers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Henk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-06 · Faint- Shippers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Wherry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.3% of games
7.0
10.5%
2W–17L · 31.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert