← Search

Lynda Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manakin Sabot, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 24W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history51 matches
W
2026-06-01 · Westwood Williams · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Betsy Holloway
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-28 · Westwood Williams · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claudia Williams
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-3
W
2026-05-18 · Westwood Williams · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claudia Williams
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-1
W
2026-05-04 · Westwood Williams · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claudia Williams
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-20 · Westwood Williams · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claudia Williams
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-13 · Westwood Williams · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dianne Dementi
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-06 · Westwood Williams · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dianne Dementi
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-05-30 · Westwood Smith 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-4
L
2025-05-16 · Westwood Smith 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Evans
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-09 · Westwood Smith 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Kohler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-02 · Westwood Smith 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Gray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-25 · Westwood Smith 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Jester
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.4% of games
7.0
40.9%
18W–26L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova