← Search

John Cantrell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Santa Barbara, CA
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
89 matches · 55W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history89 matches
W
2026-09-05 · SB LLW-More Cowbell-John Peltz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Albert DiPadova championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-09-05 · SB LLW-More Cowbell-John Peltz · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Lamoutte championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · SB LLW-More Cowbell-John Peltz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Rasmussen
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · SB LLW-More Cowbell-John Peltz · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clifford Wyatt
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · SBTC-More Cowbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Arnold
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · SBTC-More Cowbell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert DiPadova
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-22 · SBTC-More Cowbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Arnold
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-16 · SBTC-More Cowbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Hajic
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-25 · SBTC-More Cowbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert DiPadova
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-11 · SBTC-More Cowbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Peltz
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Carver mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
W
2024-03-23 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Carver mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
61.9%
39W–24L · 54.7% of games
8.0
60%
9W–6L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#1 Singles
25%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe