← Search

Petra Wiggins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Woodstock, GA
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 37W–31L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history68 matches
W
2025-09-22 · Cherokee/Kerri Schmitt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Newkirk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-08-25 · Cherokee/Kerri Schmitt · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peggy Lawrence
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-05 · Cherokee/Kerri Schmitt · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peggy Lawrence
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-1
L
2024-04-08 · Laurel Brooke - Schmitt · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Whitmore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2024-01-10 · Laurel Brooke (Nancy Vining)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Barden
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-01-02 · Laurel Brooke (Nancy Vining)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Easterling
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2023-12-14 · Laurel Brook - Schmitt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Mote mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-11-16 · Laurel Brook - Schmitt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Mote mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2023-11-07 · Laurel Brooke (Nancy Vining)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiana Pauline
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-09-25 · Laurel Brooke - Schmitt · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Barden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2023-09-18 · Laurel Brooke - Schmitt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Newkirk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-09-11 · Laurel Brooke - Schmitt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Newkirk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
56.8%
25W–19L · 52.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.7% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal