← Search

Linda Dunn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Mateo, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 10W–14L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history24 matches
W
2024-11-02 · SHARON HTS CC CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melanie Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-30 · SHARON HTS CC CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melanie Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-12 · HOPKINS PK 65AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Lim
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-05 · HOPKINS PK 65AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurel Dawson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-03-26 · HOPKINS PK 65AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Lim
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-03-15 · HOPKINS PK 65AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurel Dawson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-03-14 · HOPKINS PK 65AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Judy Prothro
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-03-05 · HOPKINS PK 65AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurel Dawson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-02-14 · HOPKINS PK 65AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gwen Havern
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2023-11-05 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Peterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2023-10-14 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Peterson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-09-24 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Peterson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 44% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.7% of games
8.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 25.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova