← Search

Liz Chambers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Altos, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 72W–109L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history181 matches
L
2026-10-09 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK CW6.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Clifford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-03 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Clifford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-27 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK CW6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Colleen McCullough
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-15 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK CW6.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Roubound
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK CW6.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Clifford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK CW6.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sherri Glenn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-25 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Nagahara-Evans
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-18 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Isaacson
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-05-18 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chie Imperato
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-15 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lenore Neal
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-13 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Nagahara-Evans
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-29 · MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Nagahara-Evans
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
36.7%
33W–57L · 45.3% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.3% of games
7.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 50.6% of games
7.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 40.6% of games
7.0mixed
44%
22W–28L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova