← Search

Steve Johannes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sugarcrk Twp, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
267 matches · 178W–89L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history267 matches
W
2026-10-16 · QRRC-Stevens · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samantha Brinkman-Berkhofer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-12 · QRRC-Johannes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Loeffelholz
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-10-04 · QRRC-Stevens · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zina Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-27 · QRRC-Johannes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clayton Burkle
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ajay Goel
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clayton Burkle
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · QRRC-Johannes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ajay Goel
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · QRRC-Johannes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariz Anklesaria
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-07 · QRRC-Johannes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Pierce
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-15 · QRRC-Johannes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Don Jenkins
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-01 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Daley
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-22 · QRRC Johannes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Hrabik
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
39W–13L · 54.9% of games
4.0
18.2%
8W–36L · 28.4% of games
6.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.9% of games
7.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 56.7% of games
8.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.7% of games
6.0mixed
91.2%
31W–3L · 67.8% of games
7.0mixed
73.6%
39W–14L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
59.1%
13W–9L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
68 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova