← Search

James Bonavita

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CLAYMONT, DE
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
20 matches · 16W–4L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history20 matches
W
2026-07-27 · DD/DCC Platinum · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Brasel
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2021-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alberto Raffo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
2021-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fred Bevans
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2021-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fred Bevans
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2021-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2021-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Hayes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2021-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
W
2021-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Al Vaccaro
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2021-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2019-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Laperle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2019-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Laperle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
80%
16W–4L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe