← Search

Jerry Nomburg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, SC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 34W–61L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history95 matches
L
2026-10-24 · LCTA54/Neill/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Neill
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-26 · LCTA54/Neill/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · LCTA (W) 3.0M 55 & Over (Herchak) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Shira mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · LCTA70/MASTALERZ/Doty · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Simpson
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-24 · LCTA70/MASTALERZ/Doty · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stan Mastalerz
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-05 · LCTA70/MASTALERZ/Doty · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fred Smith
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-12 · LCTA70/MASTALERZ/Doty · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Frank Caston
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-25 · LCTA65/Mock/AshboroughEast · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Phipps mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-24 · LCTA65/Mock/AshboroughEast · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Mock mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherri Covino mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy van Cleef mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-05-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy van Cleef mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
37.3%
22W–37L · 44.3% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 47.9% of games
3.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.1% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
26 matches
Singles
10%
9 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer