← Search

Ann Marie Schumsky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Hartford, CT
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 28W–49L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history77 matches
L
2026-09-16 · HTC:All Mixed Up:Schumsky/de Baeck · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederic de Baeck mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · HTC:All Mixed Up:Schumsky/de Baeck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Friedman mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · HTC:All Mixed Up:Schumsky/de Baeck · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederic de Baeck mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-12-08 · RFL:Tennis the Menace:Kochis/Glasgow · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Pancione
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-23 · BSF:Day Sippers:Robbins/Leon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Murnane
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-04-14 · RFL:Tennis the Menace:Robbins/Lee · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Katsoulis
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-03-24 · RFL:Tennis the Menace:Robbins/Lee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Kochis
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2023-12-05 · BSF:Day Sippers:Robbins/Leon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary-Anne Topulos
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-10-19 · MIL:Scared Hitless:Inglese · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Inglese
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2023-04-18 · BSF:Day Sippers:Robbins/Leon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Kochis
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-01 · BTC:Victorious Secret:Jeppson/Leroy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Schaffer
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2023-03-12 · SIMS:Tennis the Menace:Lee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Robbins
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
36.4%
16W–28L · 46.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
38.1%
8W–13L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova