← Search

John Hotchkiss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fremont, CA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 12W–16L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history28 matches
L
2025-04-02 · PLEASANTON 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Mayer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-12 · PLEASANTON 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Barsky
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-10-15 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harvey Sue
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-09-03 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Klinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-04-01 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Klinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-03-26 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Rocero
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-03-18 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Rocero
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-02-27 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Dasalla
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-10-31 · MISSION HILLS S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Dasalla
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2023-10-26 · MISSION HILLS S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Dasalla
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-10-24 · MISSION HILLS S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Dasalla
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
W
2023-10-17 · MISSION HILLS S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Rocero
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King