← Search

Dean Belk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rock Hill, SC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 21W–8L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-04-25 · JCato/MFarley (Weddington Chase) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kasper Nielsen
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-18 · JCato/MFarley (Weddington Chase) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kasper Nielsen
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · JCato/MFarley (Weddington Chase) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gordon Lowman
loading the estimate
7-6
L
2024-04-06 · JCato (Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tim Melton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-16 · JCato (Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Berry Allison
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-24 · JCato (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Cato
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-05 · JCato (Charlotte Indoor) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Cato championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2022-06-03 · JCato (Charlotte Indoor) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Nee championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2022-04-16 · JCato (Charlotte Indoor) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Cato
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-04-09 · JCato (Charlotte Indoor) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Cato
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-04-02 · JCato (Charlotte Indoor) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Nee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
W
2022-03-26 · JCato (Charlotte Indoor) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Cato
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
75%
6W–2L · 55.3% of games
8.5
100%
5W–0L · 54.5% of games
9.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer