← Search

Peter Faigl

— year-end
14 matches · 7W–7L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Peter Faigl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2020-10-26 · TCT:Flack/Lubchansky · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Chris Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2020-10-18 · NewEngland/Flack/40&Over4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2020-02-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Michael Frank / Raj Wadehra
2020-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
Mark Pizzi
2020-01-24 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2019-12-20 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2019-12-08 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Andy Blotner / Peter Chavez
2019-11-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2019-03-29 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Neil Collins / Robert Cueva
2019-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Teixeira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2019-01-14 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2018-12-10 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams2 teams · 2021–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.6% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 43% of the time
#1 Singles
43%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert