← Search

Derrick Tallman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
WEST HARWICH, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 15W–7L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history22 matches
W
2026-10-17 · MCAC:Lusty · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Mahoney
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikhail Doubenski
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-28 · MCAC:Veninger · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Abdel Elmemeh
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · MCAC:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Bucchanio
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-25 · MCAC:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kai Skye
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-22 · MCAC:Veninger:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Abdel Elmemeh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-2, 0-1
W
2025-02-14 · MCAC:Vojtosova:Vojtosova/Majewsk · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jana Vojtasova mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-01-24 · MCAC:Vojtosova:Vojtosova/Majewsk · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Labelle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-3, 0-1
W
2025-01-04 · MCAC:Veninger:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Dubuque
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-12-21 · MCAC:Veninger:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gerald Haigh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-12-13 · MCAC:Vojtosova:Vojtosova/Majewsk · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jana Vojtasova mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2021-12-12 · ETC:Smash:McManus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Gagnon
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.1% of games
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 59% of the time
#3 Doubles
59%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer