← Search

David Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jackson, MS
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 76W–42L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history118 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Fulton, Bradley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Matthew Jeffries
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Smith, Autumn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathrynrose Kidd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Fulton, Bradley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jay Hutton
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · Smith, Autumn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clare Millette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-27 · Fulton, Bradley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Matthew Jeffries
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · Fulton, Bradley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Matthew Jeffries
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Smith, Autumn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Ewing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-07 · Smith, Autumn · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Hayes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-05-05 · Smith, Autumn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Ewing mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-20 · Smith, Parker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geri Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-05-23 · Smith, Parker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-03-28 · Bailey, Ben · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hop Hopkins
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 43.9% of games
3.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 60.2% of games
3.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 48.4% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.6% of games
6.5
68%
17W–8L · 54.1% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.4% of games
6.0mixed
100%
10W–0L · 67.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 57.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King