← Search

Vanessa Radford

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 46W–31L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history77 matches
L
2026-04-16 · JCC- 70's · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Marshburn
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-31 · JCC- 70's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Scallon
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-30 · JCC- 70's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Engler
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-26 · JCC- 70's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Engler
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · JCC- 70's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Engler
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-16 · JCC Swingers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Palley
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-19 · JCC Rackets · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Schorr
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-05 · JCC Rackets · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca LaMear
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-22 · JCC Rackets · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbie Hartter
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-08 · JCC Rackets · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca LaMear
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-17 · JCC Rackets · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbie Hartter
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia Kelp-Lenane
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 58.8% of games
7.0
52.2%
24W–22L · 53.8% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 32.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer