← Search

Rebecca Pearson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
DALLAS, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 9W–40L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history49 matches
L
2026-02-05 · JCC/Ratcliff W3.0F · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mako Barnes
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-09 · JCC/Ratcliff W3.0F · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-16 · SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Maxwell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-09 · SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dianne Ball
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-04-11 · SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Porter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-21 · SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-14 · SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dianne Ball
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-11-07 · Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachael Kaplan
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-13 · Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Daitch
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2024-09-08 · Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Garcia
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-25 · Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachael Kaplan
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-02-25 · Greenhill/Sanders W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darci Sachdeva
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
21.4%
6W–22L · 38.9% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.1% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 41.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams