← Search

Barbara Burleigh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newark, DE
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 12W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history39 matches
L
2026-08-10 · Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Bruno
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-23 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Burslem
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Bruno
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · TLC · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Scarano
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-06-06 · TLC · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Scarano
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · TLC · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Scarano
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · TLC · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rosemary Huf
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Hitchens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Scarano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Snyder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula McGowan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janice Trainer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.7% of games
6.0
31.2%
10W–22L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 62% of the time
#3 Doubles
62%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer