← Search

Craig Warner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Berea, OH
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 157W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history226 matches
L
2026-10-24 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Zimmermann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-09 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Zimmermann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
Default
2026-10-02 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Rich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-27 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Zimmermann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-19 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Damrow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · A18 4.0M GR Canadas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilfred Santos
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-10 · A18 4.0M GR Canadas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilfred Santos
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · A18 4.0M GR Canadas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilfred Santos
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-11-01 · FD 7.0 CC Meisenbach · #1 Male Doubles · 7.0 · with Wade Hurley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-10 · X55 7.0 NC Cho · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeannette Cho mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-03 · X55 7.0 NC Cho · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Rich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-19 · X55 7.0 NC Cho · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Zimmermann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
83.7%
41W–8L · 63.5% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.6% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
85.3%
29W–5L · 63.7% of games
6.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.3% of games
7.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 50.5% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
90%
27W–3L · 64.9% of games
7.0mixed
58.1%
36W–26L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
30 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Male Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe