← Search

Cindy Benike

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Estero, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 22W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history64 matches
L
2026-03-19 · Quail West / Minor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arlyn Amsellem
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-12 · Quail West / Minor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Blakeslee
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-22 · Quail West / Minor · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Sancin
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-01-09 · Quail West / C. Seese · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Romine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-12-05 · Quail West - Seese · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Sancin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-11-21 · Quail West - Seese · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Minor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-10-31 · Quail West - Seese · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Blakeslee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-03-18 · Lighthouse Bay - Cote · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Blakeslee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-02-29 · Quail West - Seese · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Blakeslee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-02-20 · Lighthouse Bay - Cote · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Blakeslee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
W
2024-02-15 · Quail West - Seese · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Blakeslee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-02-12 · Lighthouse Bay - Cote · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anna Lis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.2% of games
8.0
27.9%
12W–31L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova