Search

Candy Dann

Andover, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
20 matches · 6W–14L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
12%
down to 3.0
88%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 8% down · 92% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.11. Higher than today’s 3.09 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Teams14 teams · 2002–2026
GLVR-Kasch/Dragoon
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
GLVR-Dragoon/Kasch
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
PTC-Lee
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
GLVR-Kasch/Dragoon
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
PT&E/SJRC-Haas
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
PTC-Dragoon
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Candy has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 47.4% of games
7.0
20%
2W–8L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history20 matches
L
2026-04-23 · GLVR-Kasch/Dragoon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia Rea
0.037below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-09-27 · GLVR-Dragoon/Kasch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Priester
0.051below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-20 · GLVR-Dragoon/Kasch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Garrene Mcgale
0.012below expectation — took 42% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Alysa Rose / Renee Schwartz
2025-09-13 · GLVR-Dragoon/Kasch · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Kellogg
0.042below expectation — took 35% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-02-22 · PTC-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kraus
0.014below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-02-16 · PTC-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Kaufman
0.016below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-02-09 · PTC-Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Novak
0.028below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-02-02 · PTC-Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Cervantez
+0.044better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-01-25 · PTC-Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Cervantez
+0.027better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-04 · PTC-Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Novak
+0.041better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-09-27 · GLVR-Kasch/Dragoon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Kellogg
0.019below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-09-22 · GLVR-Kasch/Dragoon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Kellogg
+0.022better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.