← Search

Curtis Neeld

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 39W–18L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history57 matches
L
2026-10-28 · Adult 65 & Over 8.0M McClanahan - JC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel McClanahan
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-23 · Adult 65 & Over 8.0M McClanahan - JC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel McClanahan
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-28 · Adult 65 & Over 8.0M McClanahan - JC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel McClanahan
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · Adult 65 & Over 8.0M McClanahan - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Gutierrez
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-10-08 · NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0M McClanahan - JC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Gutierrez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-09-24 · NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0M McClanahan - JC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Gutierrez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-09-10 · NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0M McClanahan - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Schaefer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-08-27 · NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0M McClanahan - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Gutierrez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-06-10 · NNM/Woodruff/55 & Over/9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Harnick
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2023-06-03 · NNM/Woodruff/55 & Over/9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brad Allpass
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-0
L
2023-05-21 · NNM/Woodruff/55 & Over/9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brad Allpass
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
W
2023-05-07 · NNM/Woodruff/55 & Over/9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Hulick
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 56.7% of games
5.0
100%
4W–0L · 60% of games
8.0
75%
9W–3L · 61.5% of games
9.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer