← Search

Randal Senn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 48W–79L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-14 · LATA40/Harrison/SSP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Maylath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · LATA40/Harrison/SSP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Senn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-09 · LATA40/Harrison/SSP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Anne Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-31 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pete Kleemoff championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Chittam championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cole Taylor championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-09 · LATA 3.5M 40 & Over (Harrison) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pete Kleemoff
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · LATA55/Harrison/SSP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pete Kleemoff
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-19 · LATA 3.5M 40 & Over (Harrison) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Duke Taylor
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-12 · LATA 3.5M 40 & Over (Harrison) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Van Horton
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · LATA55/Harrison/SSP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pete Kleemoff
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-03-05 · LATA 3.5M 40 & Over (Harrison) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregg Senn
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
3.5
40%
6W–9L · 44.8% of games
4.0
38%
27W–44L · 47.5% of games
7.5
27.3%
6W–16L · 40.7% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#1 Singles
17%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe