← Search

Carey Sherman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lawrence Township, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 9W–10L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history19 matches
L
2025-10-12 · NJ Smash · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Todd Sherman
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-3
W
2025-10-05 · NJ Smash · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Michael Rahbari Ravri
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-02 · NJ Smash · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Michael Rahbari Ravri
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-3
L
2025-09-21 · NJ Smash · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jon Rubinstein
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vivek Sahota
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
Javier Fervienza / Adam Gray
2025-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Rahbari Ravri
loading the estimate
3-3
L
2024-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Midori Yano mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Midori Yano mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
W
2022-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Douglass Coyle
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2021-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Frederick Johnson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2021-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Philippe Snoy
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2021-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Vecchio
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.7% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
3 matches
#1 Singles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe