← Search

Lauren Rasar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 57W–45L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history102 matches
W
2026-09-23 · PORCELLI/SIMMONS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Evelyn Foster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-22 · Haskins · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lee Ann Zierenberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-09 · PORCELLI/SIMMONS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kara Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · Haskins · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lee Ann Zierenberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · Haskins · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tess Casals
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · PORCELLI/SIMMONS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kara Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · Haskins · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lee Ann Zierenberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · PORCELLI/SIMMONS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kara Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-13 · Wescott · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Greene mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-29 · Wescott · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Colonna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · Wescott · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Colonna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-08 · Wescott · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Buda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.8% of games
4.0
56.1%
32W–25L · 52.5% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.4% of games
8.5
50%
5W–5L · 46.2% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.8% of games
4.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 32.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer