← Search

Angie Sanders

— year-end
151 matches · 84W–67L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Angie Sanders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-08-25 · SS-LGT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Kishbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-11 · SS-LGT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adriana Vernon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · SS-H ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Silver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-30 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · SS-H ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Silver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · SS-LGT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marty Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · SS-H ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Hallowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-21 · SS-LGT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Spehalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-16 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Hallowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · CHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-13 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eden Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
52.4%
43W–39L · 50.4% of games
8.0
65.9%
27W–14L · 59.5% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 52.2% of games
8.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams