← Search

Julie Povolo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Traverse City, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 1W–22L · seasons 2017–2025
Match history23 matches
L
2025-01-12 · Team Tesarz · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy MacKay
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-12 · Team Tesarz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Newton-Tesarz
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-01-11 · Team Tesarz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Newton-Tesarz
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-24 · Team Kaufman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alisia Pulella
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-08-24 · Team Kaufman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee Kaufman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-01-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stefee Kim
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-01-29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-01-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Rudolph
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Hodge
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-01-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darlene Germaine
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-01-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Germaine
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-24 · Team Kaufman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stefee Kim
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–10L · 32.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 33.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match
Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer