← Search

Sara Goldsmith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Rochelle, NY
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
73 matches · 39W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history73 matches
L
2026-08-18 · TCH Crazy Aces 65+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Borenstein
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · Tennis Club of Hastings 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Penge
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · Tennis Club of Hastings 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Albanese
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Tennis Club of Hastings 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Penge
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · Tennis Club of Hastings 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Penge
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · TCH Crazy Aces 65+ 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Green
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-08-13 · Southern: Tennis Club of Hastings: Crazy Aces 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Borenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-4
W
N/A
2025-07-28 · Southern: Tennis Club of Hastings: Crazy Aces 65 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judi Lippert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-26 · Tennis Club of Hastings: Crazy Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Lucido
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-12 · Tennis Club of Hastings: Crazy Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Borenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-08-21 · TCH: Crazy Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Aranow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-08-09 · TCH: Crazy Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pattison Youngren
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
51.4%
36W–34L · 50.4% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert