← Search

Marjo Hull

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indio, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 131W–97L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history228 matches
W
2026-10-31 · CV-IWTG/Matkin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thelma Sahara
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-30 · CV-IWTG/S Gray · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Francisca Mok
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-06 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Sahara · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ashley Matkin championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-05 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Sahara · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anita Kamouri championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-05 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Sahara · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Helen Hannaford championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-14 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Helen Hannaford
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Helen Hannaford
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cathy Evangelist
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Helen Hannaford
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-06 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Helen Hannaford
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-30 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Thelma Sahara · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thelma Sahara
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-25 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Sahara · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Lucht
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 61.1% of games
4.0
52.9%
46W–41L · 51% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 52.9% of games
8.0
67.7%
65W–31L · 58.5% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
40%
8W–12L · 40.9% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
39 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer