← Search

Nancy Watson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Calhoun, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 22W–21L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history43 matches
L
2025-06-23 · Cassels · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-20 · Cassels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Conlon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-14 · Cassels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Conlon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-06-07 · Cassels · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Conlon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-05-16 · Bigando/Mueret · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Bigando
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-14 · Bigando/Mueret · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Conlon
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-08 · Cassels · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Conlon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-0
W
2024-05-18 · Cassels · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-05-11 · Cassels · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karla Cassels
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2023-06-10 · Tanis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Conlon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-06-08 · Tanis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Buser
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2023-05-15 · NE/Johnson/65&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Friedman
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 50.6% of games
7.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 79% of the time
#3 Doubles
79%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer