← Search

Linda Soltis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensburg, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 11W–14L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history25 matches
W
2026-07-09 · Net Chix · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Weaver
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · Net Chix · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Kish
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-12 · Net Chix · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Sanders
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · Net Chix · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Ramsay
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-13 · Net Chix · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Sanders
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Sanders
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-4, 0-1
W
2025-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Sanders
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Sanders
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-05-18 · GRC 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Sanders
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-04 · GRC 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Sanders
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-08-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Longacre
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Longacre
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.3% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 51% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer