← Search

Marcie Merrell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 14W–52L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history66 matches
L
2026-06-14 · Great Gets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Wahlers
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-03 · Great Gets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Wahlers
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · Great Gets · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Ware
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Virginia Hatch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen McDonnold
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Wahlers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-24 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheri Bryant
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-02-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bo Vanderloop
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2024-02-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bo Vanderloop
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-11-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bo Vanderloop
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2023-10-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bo Vanderloop
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-10-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Blackwood
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
20.8%
11W–42L · 39.1% of games
6.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.3% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 73% of the time
#3 Doubles
73%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer