← Search

Jay Copan

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 100W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jay Copan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
W
Mike Kempel / David Naden
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · with Jay Gallagher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Vance Dunn / Wm David Hicks
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · with Jay Gallagher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · Ja.Copan55A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-15 · Ja.Copan65A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jay Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-02 · Ja.Copan55A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-30 · Ja.Copan55A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-25 · Ja.Copan65A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · with Rick Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Jeffrey Miller / John Hulicki
2025-10-15 · Ch.Evans55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Testa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-17 · Ch.Evans55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brett Woodson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-09-15 · Ja.Copan65C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Behar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-08-25 · Ja.Copan65C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rick Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2009–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
58.5%
31W–22L · 54.2% of games
3.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 43.5% of games
6.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 63.9% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
47 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert