← Search

Matthew Hayes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LUTZ, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
233 matches · 111W–122L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history233 matches
L
2026-10-24 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Perpetua
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-03 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Perpetua
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-26 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Constantine
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-19 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-12 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Constantine
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · Cheval Tightly Strung/Abrams · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Todd Abrams
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-08-24 · HILLS/Hayes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Abrams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-22 · Cheval Over Served/Sparr · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sean O'Brien
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-15 · Cheval Tightly Strung/Abrams · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dennis Wright
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · Cheval Over Served/Sparr · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joel Sparr
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-26 · HILLS/Hayes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charles Constantine
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · Cheval Over Served/Sparr · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kenneth Sallings
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
64.8%
59W–32L · 58% of games
4.0
37.3%
28W–47L · 45.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
7.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 42% of games
8.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.9% of games
7.0mixed
46.9%
15W–17L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
47 matches
#1 Singles
9%
21 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe