← Search

Hunter Hollingsworth

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 110W–75L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history185 matches
L
2026-10-24 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeri Noveras mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-18 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Connerley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-19 · CRANE PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Magaly Otero
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-05-20 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deirdre Burke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-15 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda DeBord
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-4
W
2026-04-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Westly
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Calise
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-07 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Mathis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-21 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy G Fagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Virginia Freeland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-29 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Calise
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-10-26 · BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 55MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Tabtab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 55.9% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.6% of games
8.0
56.2%
18W–14L · 52.7% of games
8.5
32%
8W–17L · 46.7% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
69.5%
41W–18L · 55.7% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
54 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal