← Search

Mark Skelte

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
63 matches · 36W–27L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history63 matches
W
2026-08-07 · Montana Masters · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Rutherford
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-02 · Montana Masters · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Rutherford
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · Montana Masters · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Selstad
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · Montana Masters · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Richards
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
Default
2026-07-10 · Montana Masters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Alexander
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-01 · 65- 9.0 Men Blue · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Helmig
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · 65- 9.0 Men Blue · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gene Siegel
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-15 · 65- 9.0 Men Blue · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Pete Fennell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-08 · 65- 9.0 Men Blue · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Richard Schaefer
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-25 · 65- 9.0 Men Blue · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Timothy Garcia
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2021-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raymond Legner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2021-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randall Paulson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 45.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
89.3%
25W–3L · 66.5% of games
9.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
23 matches
Singles
25%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal