← Search

Mark Mattson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Missouri City, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 78W–54L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history132 matches
L
2026-06-06 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bethuel Gabriel championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bethuel Gabriel championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-05 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Kane championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-05 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bethuel Gabriel championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-07 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Kane
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-01 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ghulam Jilani
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-25 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Kane
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-04 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hugo Gerardo Palencia Ferrer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-03 · Missouri City - Maniacs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Earl Brown
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-25 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hugo Gerardo Palencia Ferrer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-24 · Missouri City - Maniacs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wilfredo Salvador
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-02-18 · Missouri City - Serve & Folly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ghulam Jilani
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
68.4%
39W–18L · 58.7% of games
4.5
28%
7W–18L · 38.1% of games
7.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 67% of games
8.0
50%
10W–10L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal