← Search

Jennifer Warren

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 109W–82L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history191 matches
L
2026-10-21 · Dobbins/Eliason - Matchmakers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Eliason
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-14 · Dobbins/Eliason - Matchmakers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Stolar
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-10-08 · MTC #2 Britzius 9:30am · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Starita
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-17 · MTC #2 Britzius 9:30am · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Starita
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-15 · Marx: Tonka JEMM's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Starita
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Dobbins: Net Six & Chill · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Nordlie championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Dobbins: Net Six & Chill · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Nordlie championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-29 · Dobbins: Net Six & Chill · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Nordlie championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-28 · Dobbins: Net Six & Chill · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Nordlie championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · Marx: Tonka JEMM's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Starita
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · Dobbins: Net Six & Chill · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Gustafson
loading the estimate
3-5
L
2026-07-13 · Warren/Borthwick Get a Grip · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Starita
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 67.2% of games
3.5
55.6%
89W–71L · 54.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.2% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
9 matches
Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova