← Search

Richard Dickerson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 28W–66L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history94 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Dickerson-Nash (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Westphal
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-27 · Dickerson-Nash (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Jury
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · Dickerson-Nash (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Buckley
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-10 · Bostick · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Briana Bostick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-27 · Bostick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adria Concannon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-20 · Bostick · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Kammann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-13 · Bostick · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renea Harbert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Masters of Swing (Dickerson) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Uy
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · Masters of Swing (Dickerson) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Elverhoy
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · Masters of Swing (Dickerson) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yuniesky Quesada
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · Masters of Swing (Dickerson) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Wonsidler
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · Dickerson/Nash (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Sindecuse
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
29.9%
20W–47L · 42.2% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.3% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 29.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer