← Search

Jane Oxender

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
35 matches · 7W–28L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history35 matches
L
2026-07-25 · LIB-Kerr 55s 6.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kendra Kerr
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · LIB-Kerr 55s 6.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Timoszyk
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-11 · LIB-Kerr 55s 6.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Butler
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-16 · 1LIB-KERR 60NW MO 55&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Cleland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2023-07-18 · 3LIB-KERR AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Hirschl
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-11 · 3LIB-KERR AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Wolfe
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-27 · 3LIB-KERR AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bobbi Coluni
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-11-19 · 5LIB-BULLOCK 65 W/E WOMEN SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janya Somers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-11-05 · 5LIB-BULLOCK 65 W/E WOMEN SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chie Tashima MCKENNEY
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-10-22 · 5LIB-BULLOCK 65 W/E WOMEN SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chie Tashima MCKENNEY
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2022-08-04 · 5LIB-STPIERRE 70DW 55&O AD THURS SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chie Tashima MCKENNEY
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-19 · 2LIB-KERR 30NW 40&O AD TUES SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Levy
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–13L · 27.5% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.5% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.6% of games
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.3% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova