Search

Rita Spurgin

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2025
178 matches · 55W–123L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.0
98%
stay 2.5
0%
up to 3.0

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 2.5
28 of 30
NV · 2.5
31 of 33

Rita is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rita has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Rita has gone from the 43rd to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
39.2%
20W–31L · 47.2% of games
3.0
29.6%
29W–69L · 41.5% of games
6.0
21.4%
6W–22L · 33.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history178 matches
L
Maureen Kelly / Julie Brown
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Peccole
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 22% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Deborah Graham / Carla Kuhl
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Peccole
+0.009below expectation — took 14% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Alexandra Matthews / Ria Taute
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leslie Stewart
0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Melissa Williams / Seina Gebben
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nancy Peccole
+0.076better than expected — took 25% of games against 6% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Diane Schopp / Mandy Chen
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gerri Ellis
+0.029about as expected — took 20% of games against 20% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Stephanie Pugh / Liz Edwards
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Joan Chinn
0.061below expectation — took 20% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Alexandra Matthews / Kelli Caderot
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leslie Stewart
0.015below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Mandy Soh / Denisa Milar
2026-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ikuko Seigel
0.031below expectation — took 32% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Jen Loucks / Lauren Mathews
2026-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Joan Chinn
0.036below expectation — took 41% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Sirina Shouldis / Theresa Burnette
2025-12-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Peccole
+0.009below expectation — took 14% of games against 24% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Iane Premsrirut / Rafaella Reynolds
2025-12-04 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nancy Peccole
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Vikki Doak / Patricia Booth
2025-11-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Peccole
+0.038better than expected — took 25% of games against 20% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.