← Search

Linda Hudson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tallahassee, FL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 3W–13L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history16 matches
L
2024-03-03 · Bahorski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lauren Clary
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-25 · Bahorski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gayle Nelson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-18 · Bahorski · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gayle Nelson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-20 · Long (Forestmeadows) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Cutchen-Richey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-07-13 · Long (Forestmeadows) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Harriett Bunnie Hunter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-28 · Long (Forestmeadows) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
W
2023-06-08 · Long (Forestmeadows) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-06-01 · Long (Forestmeadows) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Cutchen-Richey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-05 · Bahorski (Forestmeadows) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Bahorski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-02-26 · Bahorski (Forestmeadows) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Bahorski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-05 · Bahorski (Forestmeadows) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lauren Clary
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2023-01-29 · Bahorski (Forestmeadows) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Chaves
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.2% of games
6.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 30.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe