← Search

Andree Padial

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
266 matches · 189W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history266 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Silvey/18/4.0/WD/BOC · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Barksdale
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-21 · Silvey/18/4.0/WD/BOC · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather McDonald
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-30 · Wallace/18/7.5/CWN/BREC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Wallace
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-28 · Doherty/40/7.5/CWN/Leg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Mansur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-24 · Doherty/40/7.5/CWN/Leg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Georgia Day
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-23 · Wallace/18/7.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Victoria Soileau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-21 · Doherty/40/7.5/CWN/Leg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Doherty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-18 · Williamson/55/7.5/CWD/BOC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacy Hebert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-16 · Silvey/18/4.0/WD/BOC · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather McDonald
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Silvey championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Edmonson championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Salomone mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams97 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
9W–0L · 72% of games
4.0
77.8%
105W–30L · 60.4% of games
4.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 30% of games
7.5
74.1%
40W–14L · 61.3% of games
8.5
100%
5W–0L · 68.6% of games
4.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 52.1% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
138 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
42 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert