← Search

Dana Baggett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 54W–137L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history191 matches
L
2026-10-19 · Bordelon/55/3.5/WD/BREC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Weger
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-10-07 · Skrandel/40/6.5/CWN/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Guillory
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-28 · Bordelon/55/3.5/WD/BREC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Bordelon
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-23 · Skrandel/40/6.5/CWN/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Chapman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-09-14 · Bordelon/55/3.5/WD/BREC · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Wilkins
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-09-09 · Skrandel/40/6.5/CWN/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danielle Skrandel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-14 · Skrandel/40/6.5/CWN/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Magee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · Erwin/55/7.5/CWD/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Fontenot
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · BRAUD/55/3.5/MD/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Baggett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Weger/40/3.5/MD/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Nevarez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · BRAUD/55/3.5/MD/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Magnon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-09 · Weger/40/3.5/MD/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Baggett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–6L · 32% of games
3.5
51.7%
30W–28L · 52% of games
4.0
20.8%
10W–38L · 39.2% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.2% of games
7.5
17.5%
7W–33L · 36.1% of games
3.5mixed
20.8%
5W–19L · 42.7% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 32.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert