← Search

Trish Lebsack

Windsor, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 69W–80L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Trish Lebsack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-08-31 · LVTA RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy McIlvenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-24 · LVTA RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · LVTA RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy McIlvenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · LVTA RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonda Huhta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · HMTC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy McIlvenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-29 · HMTC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcee Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · HMTC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcee Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · LVTA RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy McIlvenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · HMTC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · HMTC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicki Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · HMTC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcee Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · HMTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy McIlvenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
44.6%
45W–56L · 48.2% of games
7.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.3% of games
8.0
46.7%
14W–16L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova