← Search

Michael Sessions

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tyler, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 43W–72L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history115 matches
W
2026-03-29 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-28 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-13 · Baker - Faulkner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobby Howard
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-01 · Baker - Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Middleton
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-23 · Baker - Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Cole
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-29 · Baker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Skogerboe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-06 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-2, 4-3
W
2025-04-06 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-4, 4-3, 1-0
L
2025-03-29 · Ivy - Spring Hill HS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Samuel Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-02 · Baker - Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Heckmann
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-03-02 · Ivy - Spring Hill HS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Samuel Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-02-16 · Baker - Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 48.1% of games
4.0
11.1%
2W–16L · 30.8% of games
7.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 53% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 46% of the time
Singles
46%
53 matches
#1 Singles
21%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe