← Search

Jeanne Wilson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Aptos, CA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
19 matches · 8W–11L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history19 matches
W
2026-05-17 · SEASCAPE SC 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janiene P Scott
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · SEASCAPE SC 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabrina Lawrence
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · SEASCAPE SC 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Hitchcock
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-04-05 · SEASCAPE SC 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Amrhein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-29 · SEASCAPE SC 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Hitchcock
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-03-01 · SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bridget Maloney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-02-22 · SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janette Labau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-02-21 · SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bridget Maloney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-30 · SEASCAPE SC 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jocelyn Whidden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2022-03-04 · SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bridget Maloney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-02-23 · SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Keith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2022-02-16 · SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alicia Escobar-Roppel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 56.8% of games
8.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer