← Search

Suzanne Grossman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlottesville, VA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 3W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-06-09 · Farmington - Riddick - 4.0 Ladies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Barger
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-22 · Farmington-Musser · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Strickler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-05-08 · Farmington-Musser · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Lafond
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-24 · Farmington-Musser · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Trojan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-02 · FARMINGTON-Musser · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Barger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-10 · FARMINGTON-Musser · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marsha Musser
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-03 · FARMINGTON-Musser · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Jennings
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2022-10-24 · FCC Gavin/Waters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jillian Dann
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2022-10-17 · FCC Gavin/Waters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Genevieve Verlaak
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2022-09-13 · Keswick · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacy Carr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2022-08-16 · Keswick · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nancy Holt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2022-06-08 · Farmington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sabina Martin
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
10%
1W–9L · 37.8% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.6% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 35.1% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova